I taught my first philosophy classes in the autumn of 1952, =
at=20
Northwestern University. In those days, an instructor was expected =
to=20
teach three or four courses a quarter, and thus in the space of a =
year I=20
taught nine or 10 different courses, most of which were simply =
assigned to=20
me. One was a course on =93The Rationalists,=94 meaning Descartes, =
Spinoza and=20
Leibniz (fortunately, I had the benefit of having taken a course =
on=20
Spinoza taught by the great Harry Wolfson in 1949). The interest =
in=20
Spinoza evoked by being assigned that bit of =93forced labor=94 =
stayed with=20
me, as did a certain puzzlement.
At the other end of my teaching career, shortly before I =
retired from=20
Harvard University in 2000, I directed a dissertation on Spinoza =
by Nancy=20
Levene, later reworked into her book Spinoza=92s Revelation: =
Religion,=20
Democracy, and Reason. By then, I was pretty familiar with =
Spinoza and=20
Spinoza scholarship, as well as with Spinoza=92s enormous =
influence on=20
German philosophers (not only Leibniz, but also Hegel), but the =
puzzlement=20
was still with me. The puzzle was that, although I could see how =
Spinoza=92s=20
metaphysics was supposed to =93work,=94 I could not fathom Spinoza =
the human=20
being, and that meant that the mighty system did not ultimately =
make sense=20
to me.
The reason it didn=92t =93make sense=94 is that=97as the =
title of his=20
masterwork, Ethics, indicates=97Spinoza didn=92t just =
produce a=20
metaphysical system and an epistemology to go with it (although =
that=92s=20
what has always attracted the most philosophical attention), but =
also an=20
ethical philosophy in the ancient sense. His philosophy attempts =
to answer=20
the great three-word question=97How to live?=97in a way =
that includes=20
saying what the ideal life would be and what the place of man in =
the=20
cosmos is, and not just rules for conduct. And I do not believe =
that one=20
can understand what a philosopher who proposes to answer that =
three-word=20
question really means if one doesn=92t understand the philosopher =
as a=20
fellow man (even if Spinoza would have thought that the latter =
sort of=20
understanding is irrelevant).
Rebecca Goldstein=92s Betraying Spinoza speaks =
directly to my=20
puzzlement. As she points out, Spinoza was the most private of =
men. He=20
wished to be known solely though his philosophical arguments, =
which he saw=20
as products of pure reason. He would certainly not have approved =
of her=20
project of understanding him in human terms and in Jewish terms, =
as a=20
child born in a tolerant country (Holland) whose parents were =
survivors of=20
the Spanish Inquisition. That=92s why she calls her book =
Betraying=20
Spinoza.
Obviously, this relatively short book (287 pages, including=20
chronology, notes, etc.) is not an =93analysis=94 of Spinoza=92s =
system; rather,=20
it is an analysis of Spinoza the man. And Ms. Goldstein, author of =
The=20
Mind-Body Problem (1983), brings to that difficult task the =
skills of=20
a novelist: the skill, above all, of vividly imagining the life of =
another=20
human being, and the skill of being able to evoke that life by her =
words.=20
She is also a trained philosopher, one who, like myself, has found =
herself=20
teaching a course on =93the seventeenth-century rationalists=94 =
and who has=20
felt just the puzzlement I described.
But this is also=97though not obtrusively or irrelevantly =
so=97a book=20
about Rebecca Goldstein herself, and of the particularly Jewish =
way in=20
which Spinoza entered her life. It initially happened, she tells =
us, in a=20
yeshiva high school for girls. Her favorite teacher, Mrs. =
Schoenfeld, told=20
the girls the story of Spinoza as =93a cautionary tale of =
unbridled human=20
intelligence blindly seeking its own doom.=94 =93He was a =
brilliant student,=94=20
Mrs. Schoenfeld told them, =93a boy born with blessings. His very =
name, of=20
course, means =91blessed=92 in the holy tongue. Yet this misguided =
young man =85=20
who might have used his superior mind to increase our knowledge of =
the=20
Torah, had died with the pagan name of Benedictus, =
excommunicated=20
and cursed by his own people, condemned and reviled even by =
believing=20
Christians. Let the history of the philosopher Spinoza serve as a =
warning=20
to you, girls, of the dangers of asking the wrong =
questions.=94
Fortunately, Ms. Goldstein did not heed her teacher=92s =
warning. What=20
she learned about Spinoza many years later is not unknown to =
scholars=20
(although the way she brings out Spinoza=92s brilliance as a =
psychologist=20
was new to me). In Spinoza and Other Heretics, for example, =
Yirmiyahu Yovel has traced the importance of the =93Marrano=94 =
experience (the=20
experience of people like Spinoza=92s parents, of pretending to be =
Christians in Spain while secretly practicing Judaism) to =
Spinoza=92s=20
development, and Nancy Levene has explained the importance of =
Spinoza to=20
democratic thought, from the 17th-century Enlightenment till now. =
And I=20
have said that this is a =93short=94 book. But short as it is, it =
succeeds in=20
integrating an amazing number of facets of Spinoza=92s life and =
thought. And=20
despite its brevity, it also succeeds in selecting and describing =
the key=20
political developments, both in the Netherlands as a whole and in =
the=20
microcosm of the Jewish community in Amsterdam.
Betraying Spinoza is beautifully crafted. What seem =
like=20
separate issues=97Spinoza=92s pioneering advocacy of complete =
freedom of=20
thought in religious matters; the turmoil in the Jewish community; =
the=20
fateful events in Amsterdam in the closing years of Spinoza=92s =
life; the=20
philosophical developments of the 17th century; Spinoza=92s idea =
of a=20
philosophical religion utterly purged of all anthropomorphism, =
even to the=20
extent of denying that God is a =93person=94 in any sense=97come =
together as if=20
by themselves (the sure sign of a fine artist!) to answer my =
puzzle: how=20
to understand Spinoza the human being, a man for whom reason =
itself was a=20
kind of salvation.
Hilary Putnam is the Cogan University =
Professor=20
Emeritus in the Harvard Department of Philosophy.=20
copyright =A9 2006 the new york =
observer, llc=20
| all rights=20
reserved